A Comparative Study Amongst Well-liked, New, and Unfavorable Brands
The Core Concept
The Research Gap
Research Goal: Compare the drivers of SBC—Brand Attitude, Familiarity, and Self-Presentation—across three distinct brand states.
Key Theories
Hypothesized Drivers
Two Comparative Studies using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
Study 1 — New vs. Well-Liked
Study 2 — Unfavorable vs. Well-Liked
1. The Dominance of SPB
For New and Unfavorable brands, only Self-Presentation (SPB) positively predicts SBC. - New brand: SPB (\(\beta=0.74\)) | Attitude (\(\beta=0.03\), ns) - Unfavorable: SPB (\(\beta=0.72\)) | Familiarity (\(\beta=-0.13\))
2. The Well-Liked Exception
For well-liked brands, Attitude (\(\beta=0.46\)) and Familiarity (\(\beta=0.20\)) are the primary drivers of connection.
3. The Dilution Effect
Love-Becomes-Hate: For unfavorable brands, higher familiarity actually weakens the connection. Negative memories act as a barrier to recovery.
SPB serves as an “informational cue” or identity signal that bypasses the lack of prior knowledge (new) or presence of negative knowledge (unfavorable).
Strategy for the Weak & Wounded
Tactical Implementation